Knowledge Base / Story
Product and installation lessons

Learning from Armaplate

What a useful early shield taught me about matching products to real attacks, designing for the installer and making instructions part of the product.

Mercedes Vito security installation using Armaplate, deadlocks and an alarm

Where Armaplate added genuine security value

Before and after: a Mercedes van door handle damaged by a screwdriver attack, then repaired and reinforced with an Armaplate handle shield
Before and after: handle-area attack damage repaired and reinforced with an Armaplate shield.

Armaplate products were useful on vehicles such as the Mercedes Sprinter from 1996 to 2017 and Mercedes Vito models before 2015. At that time thieves commonly pushed a screwdriver between the door handle and the van bodywork to reach the locking mechanism. A correctly selected external stainless-steel plate could reinforce the area being attacked.

Fleets became familiar with Armaplate and often specified the product again when replacing their vans. The important lesson, however, was that a familiar product should not automatically be carried forward when the vehicle and the attack method had changed.

When the attack moved away from the handle

Jeff Scott holding a drilled-out lock barrel next to a Ford Transit driver's door with a hole drilled through the panel
A Ford Transit driver's door barrel attack — the point where the market's focus on handle shields stopped matching the real point of entry.

By around 2016, Ford Transit Custom and Transit MK8 vans were being attacked through the driver's door barrel. Thieves then evolved towards attacking latches directly, sometimes far away from the handles. In my opinion, the market did not adapt quickly enough. Handle shields continued to be developed and fitted to doors where they often added little or no protection against the attack actually taking place.

I found it frustrating to see a customer's security budget spent on a visible product that did not address the relevant weakness, when the same money could have been used for another layer that added real value.

Learning to design for the person fitting the product

An Armaplate handle mechanism partially dismantled and modified so that it would fit
Modifying an existing handle mechanism just to make the product fit — exactly the kind of installer workaround I wanted to design out.

Armaplate also became my clearest example of why product development must consider the installer. On some products the studs sat unnecessarily close to the edge of the plate, leaving very little tolerance and a real risk of an inaccurately drilled hole remaining visible. Some stud positions were difficult to reach, were close to cables or wiring, or required internal handle components to be removed and drilled simply to gain access to the fixing nuts.

Oversized gaskets could bulge beyond the edge of the shield. Products were supplied without the detailed fitting instructions I believed installers needed. I spoke to Armaplate on multiple occasions and asked for instructions. I remember being told there was no time to produce them because the company was too busy with product development. That stayed with me: every installer then had to spend time rediscovering the method and the hazards for themselves.

Writing our own Mercedes Vito instructions

A hand fitting an Armaplate shield to a van door handle, aligning the stud with the marked position
One of the step photographs from the Mercedes Vito Armaplate installation document I wrote for our own installers in 2014.

In 2014 Sussex Installation Team Ltd was carrying out security installations for four local Rossetts commercial-vehicle dealerships. Because I was responsible for the standard of the work completed by my staff, I wrote our own Mercedes Vito Armaplate installation document. I could not responsibly leave each installer to guess how the product should be fitted or where the known risks were.

That experience helped establish principles I still use today: consistent terminology, clear photographs, warnings beside the relevant step, repeatable measurements and enough detail that an installer does not have to interpret a tiny low-resolution image while working inside a door.

View the original Mercedes Vito Armaplate fitting instructions (PDF) →

How the shortcomings influenced our own shields

Sussex Installations printed fitting instructions being held up in front of a Ford Transit Custom
Comprehensive printed fitting instructions became a standard part of every Sussex Installations shield, not an afterthought.

The original Sussex Installations shields shared some basic characteristics with Armaplate: an external stainless-steel plate, welded studs and through-body fixings. But the shortcomings I had observed pushed me towards a different approach. Products should match current attack methods, be easier to install accurately, avoid unnecessary risks to vehicle components and be supplied with comprehensive instructions.

None of our suppliers were making security shields that solved the break in methods

An early 3D-printed prototype van security shield in green plastic, marked up by hand for further modification
An early 3D-printed prototype, marked up by hand to test and refine the design before committing to metal.

When thieves began making holes directly through thin door skins to attack the latch, the answer was no longer another handle shield. That gap helped push me into CAD, prototyping and eventually manufacturing internal and external latch-protection products. It also led to the later separation of visible OG Shields and concealed Stealth Shields as compatible but independent security layers.

The lasting lesson

A product should not be fitted because a fleet, installer or customer recognises its name. It should be fitted because its design addresses the attack relevant to that particular door and vehicle. Product design, installation method, instructions and real-world security value are all parts of the same product.

A product should not be fitted because a fleet, installer or customer recognises its name.

Common questions

Is Armaplate still a good product to fit today?

The Armaplate Sentinel handle shields that have been referred to in this document have now been discontinued by the manufacturer and are generally not available to purchase anymore. I do believe that there are still Armaplate immobiliser products available, but I do not know if it is connected to the same Armaplate (UK) Ltd company or have any direct experience to comment on it.

Which vans did Armaplate genuinely help protect?

Armaplate added real value on vehicles such as the Mercedes Sprinter from 1996 to 2017 and Mercedes Vito models before 2015, where thieves commonly forced a screwdriver between the door handle and the bodywork to reach the locking mechanism.

Why did handle shields stop being enough after around 2016?

Attacks moved on. Ford Transit Custom and Transit MK8 vans began being attacked through the driver's door barrel, and thieves then progressed to attacking the latch directly, sometimes nowhere near the handle. A handle shield fitted out of habit no longer addressed where the real risk was.

What installation problems did fitting Armaplate reveal?

Some stud positions sat very close to the edge of the plate, wiring or internal handle components, leaving little tolerance for error and no vehicle-specific instructions to guide installers. Those lessons directly shaped how Sussex Installations designs and documents its own shields today.

Page details

Author
Jeff Scott
Publisher
Sussex Installation Team Ltd
Updated
2026-08-27
Primary focus
Product and installation lessons
Jeff Scott, founder of Sussex Installation Team Ltd
About the author

Jeff Scott — Van Security Specialist and Industry Educator

Jeff Scott is the founder of Sussex Installation Team Ltd (Sussex Installations). He has fitted vehicle-security systems since 1997, started Sussex Installations in 2003 and has specialised in van security since 2008. His work combines installation, vulnerability research, product design, UK manufacturing and long-term public education.

In 2009, Jeff published the first known YouTube video explaining mechanical key-operated van deadlocks. He has continued documenting van-security products, installation standards, vehicle vulnerabilities and changing attack methods ever since – earning his description as "The OG Van Security YouTuber."

Jeff has supported thousands of professional vehicle aftermarket technicians across the UK and beyond with access to technical information, while actively promoting higher quality installation standards through his trade community ifitstuff.com since 2006.

Videos supporting this story

Van security deadlocks, slamlocks or Armaplate
Historical product context

Deadlocks, Slamlocks or Armaplate?

An early explanation of the different jobs performed by independent locks and protection around a manufacturer's vulnerable locking area.

Open video and transcript →
First Sussex Installations internal and external latch shield set
The next generation

Internal and External Latch Shield Set

The move from protecting the handle area to protecting the actual latch and the route used by tools through the door skin.

Open video and transcript →
How to fit Armaplate? - Are you thinking of fitting Armaplate Van Security?
Sep 2014 · Dated evidence

How to Fit Armaplate — Installation Lessons

A practical fitting video documenting the realities of installing bolt-on reinforcement, and the lessons that later influenced safer fixing positions and clearer instructions.

Open video and transcript →
Mercedes Vito repaired and secured up after break in using Armaplate and deadlocks
Nov 2013 · Repair evidence

Mercedes Vito Repaired and Secured After a Break-In

A real customer's handle-area break-in repaired and reinforced with Armaplate, with deadlocks fitted to every door for overnight security.

Open video and transcript →